Sunday, February 22, 2009

Victim or Failure?

In what ways do you find Nora a victim? In what ways at fault?

Upon reviewing the first two acts of Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House, I have come to the conclusion that Nora is primarily a victim of a series of circumstances outside of her control. She does what she thinks is right. Her poor judgment of what is righteous and appropriate—not any evil intention—is her primary character flaw. When she asks Krogstad, “Isn’t a daughter entitled to try and save her father from worry and anxiety on his deathbed? Isn’t a wife entitled to save her husband’s life?” she seems to be asking two completely sincere, rational questions. She steps out of the boundaries drawn for her as a woman by society. But she also crosses another boundary; she seems to have no sense of guilt at the time that she forges her own father’s name to receive the money that she is not allowed to receive. In these ways, she is at fault. Yet she reacts sensibly and in a way that anybody can relate to. She is facing extraordinary circumstances—a dying father and an ill husband, both of whom she at least thinks she loves very much—and she reacts with extraordinary, but in her mind necessary, measures. Nora is in many ways a victim of society. The measures she takes would have been unnecessary if she were a man in the same time and place, because women were not allowed to sign the document that Nora needed signed. Her dishonesty is of course less than admirable, but I believe that it is the price she had to pay to save at least her husband. Her behavior would certainly have been hard to understand in that time period, but that is precisely Ibsen’s point. He resents the extreme actions a woman like Nora would have to make to accomplish the same thing that a man could accomplish very easily. To interpret Nora as a villain who did an evil thing is to miss Ibsen’s primary message of A Doll’s House. Sure, she was dishonest, and maybe she should have felt more guilt at the time. But she was a victim more of society than of her own personal flaws.

8 comments:

LCC said...

Handy--No way in Hades you posted at 4:59 PM today--I was watching you perform at 4:59 PM today.

And how did I get this far thinking you played alto in the band?

Loved the concert--thanks for telling me about it.

And if the message is about the shortcomings of the culture, is Nora the only victim, or do other characters find their humanity compromised as well? Hhhmmmm....

Isabel Hines said...

I totally agree with you about Nora's victimization! Very well-thoughout analysis. I also like your point about her poor judgment being her flaw, totally hadn't thought of that! Great blog over all! You deserve a high five for sure...but without crackers this time!

Ben Murphy said...

Good blog Jack... a good example of how the man keeps us down... and how life in general keeps us down.

Kendra Simon said...

Wow Jack! I've totally changed my opinion of Nora after reading this blog. I never really thought about how she was constrained by society. I love how you point out that she would not have been forced to forge her signature in the first place if society had not placed greater contraints on women. Again, I really like this blog Jack! Great Job!

Richie Zitomer said...

Great blog Jack. Very well argued, I think you perfectly identify all the places that Nora is and isn't a victim and make a great point about a larger theme. I like how you didn't focus on Helmer but instead chose to look at society as a whole and its effect on Nora. I had not really looked at it that way, so this blog was enlightening. I was disappointed, however, that your entry was not in song form.

Sophie C-K said...

Jack,

Thank you for an interesting blog about how to look at Nora. We discussed this in class today a little, and I am eager to continue the discussion with you.

Anna Silverman said...

Jack

Great job! This is a fabulous analysis of Nora’s fault in her situation while addressing the aspects of her life which are completely out of her control. You summarize the argument really well when you say that, “sure, she was dishonest, and maybe she should have felt more guilt at the time. But she was a victim more of society than of her own personal flaws.”

Unknown said...

Understanding is your job, thoughts are personal. Reality and truth differ from your thoughts. Truth,facts,other persons who see saw heard know said win this story.